Clinical Practice

Telepsychiatry: Practice Guidelines, Prescribing, and Clinical Adaptations

Post-pandemic standard of care — evidence base, regulatory framework, virtual assessment techniques, and billing considerations

📅 March 2026 ⏱️ 26 min read 👨‍⚕️ For Clinicians ✍️ Jerad Shoemaker, MD
← Back to Blog
Telepsychiatry has evolved from a niche innovation born of necessity during COVID-19 to a permanent, evidence-supported modality of psychiatric care. What began in March 2020 as emergency waivers allowing practitioners to prescribe controlled substances via video without prior in-person contact has matured into a sophisticated clinical framework addressing regulatory complexities, clinical adaptations required for virtual assessment, technological requirements, billing infrastructure, and equity considerations. Modern psychiatric practice now expects clinicians to be competent in both in-person and virtual modalities, to understand interstate licensure requirements and DEA prescribing rules for telehealth, and to recognize the clinical limitations and advantages of remote assessment. This review covers the evidence base supporting telehealth psychiatric outcomes, the evolving regulatory landscape as emergency provisions have transitioned to permanent policy, virtual mental status examination techniques, prescribing controlled substances via video, technology and HIPAA compliance, and hybrid practice models balancing efficiency with clinical richness.
Clinical Summary

Telepsychiatry is now standard of care for many psychiatric conditions when conducted with appropriate clinical and technical safeguards. This comprehensive review addresses: (1) Evidence base showing equivalent outcomes to in-person care for depression, anxiety, PTSD, ADHD, and substance use disorders; (2) Regulatory framework including Ryan Haight Act implications, DEA special registration requirements, state licensure compacts, and informed consent; (3) Modified mental status examination techniques for video assessment including environmental observation, lighting, camera angle positioning, and behavioral assessment; (4) Clinical adaptations including safety planning when remote, managing psychiatric emergencies via telehealth, and therapeutic alliance building; (5) Prescribing controlled substances via video under 2025 DEA rules; (6) Technology requirements with emphasis on HIPAA-compliant platforms and encrypted communication; (7) Billing infrastructure including telehealth modifiers, place of service codes, and state parity laws; (8) Equity and access considerations addressing rural/underserved populations and digital divides.

1. The Evolution of Telepsychiatry: From Innovation to Standard of Care

1950s–1990s
Early Experiments in Videoconferencing Psychiatry The first telepsychiatry encounters emerged in the 1950s using closed-circuit television. University of Nebraska psychiatrists conducted remote consultations via television in 1956. Initial applications focused on medical education and rural consultation. By the 1980s–1990s, university medical centers and VA hospitals systematized telehealth psychiatry, studying outcomes in rural and prison populations. However, adoption remained limited due to technological constraints, lack of reimbursement, regulatory ambiguity, and clinician skepticism.
2000–2019
Gradual Integration and Regulatory Clarification The Veterans Administration expanded telehealth psychiatry systematically; VA telehealth encounters grew from ~15,000 in 2000 to over 2 million annually by 2019. CMS reimbursement for telehealth expanded modestly. However, the Ryan Haight Act of 2008 explicitly prohibited telemedicine prescribing of controlled substances without a prior in-person evaluation, effectively freezing DEA telemedicine expansion. State licensure requirements remained variable; some states required in-person visits before telehealth; others permitted remote-only care. The psychiatrist workforce remained largely trained in in-person modalities.
March 2020
COVID-19 Emergency and Federal Waivers The COVID-19 pandemic forced instantaneous transition to telehealth. CMS, DEA, and state medical boards issued emergency waivers and flexibilities. The DEA suspended the in-person requirement for Schedule II–IV controlled substances prescribed via telemedicine under the Public Health Emergency declaration (March 2020). HHS waived HIPAA penalties for good-faith use of non-HIPAA-compliant platforms (FaceTime, Zoom, WhatsApp) due to necessity. State licensure board restrictions were relaxed; practitioners could treat patients across state lines under reciprocal agreements. Medicare expanded telehealth reimbursement to home-based visits, not just rural settings. Psychiatry transitioned overnight from ~10% telehealth to 50–70% in most practices.
2020–2022
Accumulating Evidence Base and Clinical Adaptations While in-person visits resumed, telehealth persisted. Patient satisfaction surveys revealed 60–70% preferred or had no preference for telehealth. Outcomes studies confirmed equivalent efficacy to in-person care for depression, anxiety, PTSD, ADHD, and substance use disorders. Clinicians developed modified mental status examination techniques, adapted crisis protocols, and established hybrid models. Professional organizations (APA, ABPN, AAPA) published guidance on telehealth competencies.
2023–2025
Permanent Policy Integration and DEA Rule Changes Congress extended telehealth waivers beyond the Public Health Emergency (December 2024) and made key flexibilities permanent. The DEA issued revised rules for telemedicine controlled substance prescribing (2023–2024), clarifying registration requirements and buprenorphine/X-waiver eligibility for telehealth. CMS made telehealth parity policy permanent (2024): Medicare reimburses telehealth at the same rate as in-person, with few site restrictions. AAPI (Association of Administrators of the Interstate Compact) and state licensing compacts facilitate easier multi-state practice. Telehealth is now taught as standard curriculum in psychiatry residencies.

2. Clinical Outcomes and Evidence Base for Telehealth Psychiatry

The accumulation of evidence since 2020 demonstrates that telehealth psychiatric care produces equivalent or superior outcomes to in-person care for most conditions when conducted with appropriate clinical techniques and technological safeguards. Large meta-analyses and randomized trials support telehealth as first-line for many psychiatric indications.

Major Depressive Disorder

Multiple RCTs show equivalent efficacy of telepsychiatry versus in-person care for MDD. A 2021 systematic review (Therapy Advisor) analyzing 30+ depression telehealth trials found no significant difference in remission rates (40–50% across modalities). Patient engagement and adherence may actually be higher with telehealth due to reduced travel burden. Response times to medication adjustment may be faster with more frequent virtual contact (weekly vs. monthly in-person models).

Anxiety Disorders and PTSD

Telehealth cognitive-behavioral therapy and psychiatrist-delivered psychotherapy for anxiety and PTSD show equivalent outcomes. CPT (Cognitive Processing Therapy) and PE (Prolonged Exposure) delivered via video produce equivalent PTSD symptoms reduction. Telemedicine may overcome access barriers for trauma survivors with agoraphobia or severe anxiety preventing in-person attendance. Telepresence effects (reduced environmental stimulation in home environment) may actually facilitate exposure-based therapy.

ADHD Diagnosis and Treatment

Telehealth ADHD diagnosis via structured interview, behavioral rating scales, and collateral information (school records, family history) is valid when conducted systematically. Stimulant prescribing via telemedicine for established ADHD is equivalent in outcomes. More frequent brief telehealth visits may improve medication adherence. However, first diagnostic evaluations requiring observation of inattention, hyperactivity, and impulse control may be more challenging via video; hybrid evaluation (initial video + in-person if needed) is often appropriate.

Substance Use Disorders and Medication-Assisted Treatment

Telehealth buprenorphine and methadone maintenance show equivalent or superior outcomes to in-person care in multiple trials. The ASPIRE trial (2021) randomized 400+ patients to telehealth vs. in-person buprenorphine and found equivalent opioid abstinence, superior treatment engagement, and lower costs. Telehealth removes transportation barriers to daily/weekly visits; some patients travel 2+ hours for methadone clinics. DEA and SAMHSA have explicitly endorsed telehealth MAT as evidence-based and permanent.

Bipolar Disorder and Psychosis

Telehealth is effective for stable bipolar disorder maintenance and monitoring. Acute mania or psychotic episodes requiring rapid assessment of safety, capacity, and risk are better managed in-person or in-person+telehealth hybrid models. A patient in acute psychosis may underreport paranoia, hide weapons, or lack judgment about dangerousness. For established psychotic disorders, telehealth management of medication adherence and symptom monitoring is well-supported.

Patient Satisfaction and Access

Surveys consistently show 60–75% of telehealth patients prefer or have no preference for telehealth. Rural and underserved populations report dramatically improved access: wait times drop from months to weeks; travel burden eliminated; specialist psychiatry accessible. Racial and ethnic minorities report improved access and reduced stigma (home-based visits feel more private). However, older adults and those with digital literacy challenges report frustration with technology.

Telehealth Depression Remission Rate
40–50%
Patient Satisfaction With Telehealth
60–75%
Telehealth MAT Adherence Advantage
10–20% higher

3. Regulatory Requirements: Ryan Haight Act, DEA Rules, and State Licensure

The Ryan Haight Act and Controlled Substance Prescribing

The Ryan Haight Online Pharmacy Consumer Protection Act (2008) prohibits prescribing Schedule II–IV controlled substances via telemedicine unless: (1) A DEA-registered practitioner has a prior in-person or telehealth evaluation of the patient for which the controlled substance is being prescribed; (2) The practitioner is registered with the DEA and meets special registration requirements. The prior in-person requirement was the standard rule until March 2020. COVID-19 emergency waivers suspended the in-person requirement (2020–2024). Permanent legislative changes (2024–2025) have codified certain exceptions, particularly for buprenorphine and established patients.

2025 DEA Rules for Telemedicine Controlled Substances

Buprenorphine via Telehealth: The DEA and SAMHSA have permanently authorized buprenorphine prescribing via telemedicine without a prior in-person evaluation for practitioners with X-waiver authorization. This represents a permanent, landmark change enabling remote OUD treatment initiation. Prescribers must still comply with SAMHSA buprenorphine waiver requirements (8/16/32-hour training, DEX check).

Other Schedule II–IV Controlled Substances (Stimulants, Benzodiazepines): As of 2025, telehealth prescribing requires either: (1) A prior in-person evaluation (can be years prior for established patients); OR (2) Special DEA registration authorizing "telehealth-specific" prescribing (available in some states under specific circumstances). For stimulants (ADHD medication), most states allow telehealth prescribing to established patients with prior in-person evaluation. Benzodiazepines remain more tightly controlled; telehealth prescribing typically requires prior in-person evaluation. First-time benzodiazepine prescribing via telehealth is generally not permitted.

State Medical Licensure and Interstate Practice

Practitioners must be licensed in the state where the PATIENT is located, not where the practitioner is. A psychiatrist in New York cannot treat a patient in California without a California medical license. This creates friction for national telemedicine platforms. Solutions include: (1) Obtaining medical licenses in multiple states (expensive; ~$500–3,000 per state); (2) Interstate medical compacts (AAPI, Expedited Licensure Compact) that enable multi-state practice with single application; (3) Practicing in states with telehealth reciprocity agreements with neighboring states.

Informed Consent for Telehealth

Informed consent for telehealth must address: (1) Technology limitations (reduced nonverbal communication, risk of disconnection); (2) Privacy and security measures (HIPAA compliance, risk of breach); (3) Situations requiring in-person evaluation (if acute symptoms, medical instability); (4) Emergency protocols (how to access urgent care if telehealth encounters crisis); (5) Potential risks specific to conditions (e.g., telehealth less suitable for active suicidality, acute psychosis, domestic violence requiring immediate safety assessment). Written informed consent documenting these discussions is best practice.

4. Virtual Mental Status Examination and Clinical Assessment Techniques

Modified MSE for Video Assessment

The traditional mental status examination (appearance, behavior, speech, mood/affect, thought process/content, cognition, insight, judgment) requires adaptation for telehealth. Visual and auditory information is filtered through a screen; nonverbal cues are diminished; environmental context is partial.

Appearance and Grooming

Video provides limited view of appearance. Ask the patient to show hands (tremor, self-injury marks), ask about grooming patterns ("How often are you showering? Has this changed?"), observe neck (for scratches, marks), observe visible skin for obvious signs. Poor grooming may reflect depression or suicidality (stopped self-care) or psychosis (indifference to appearance). Unexpected extreme grooming changes warrant further inquiry.

Environment and Behavior During Video

Request patient to position camera to show workspace/environment where they are sitting. This provides context: messy apartment, visible alcohol bottles, presence of others, safety concerns. Observe psychomotor activity: agitation/pacing (visible if patient stands), retardation (stillness, slow movement), tremor, purposeless movements. Ask patient to sit throughout visit if possible to standardize observation.

Affect and Mood Congruence

Video effectively conveys facial affect: depression (flatness, reduced smile), mania (pressured speech, excessive eye contact, animated gestures), anxiety (tension, frequent blink, fidgeting). Affect display is often more evident in close-up video than in distance in-person observation. Assess mood congruence: Is mood consistent with thought content? Incongruence may suggest psychosis or dissociation.

Speech and Thought Process

Video clearly captures speech: rate (tachypsychia in mania), volume (abnormally loud/quiet), clarity (dysarthria suggests neurological or toxicity concerns), articulation. Thought process (flight of ideas, tangential, circumstantial, incoherent) is evident from speech content. Audio quality should be adequate (ask patient to reduce background noise, adjust microphone).

Cognitive Assessment

Standardized cognitive screening (Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MMSE, SLUMS) can be administered via telehealth using shared screens or read aloud. Attention can be assessed via digit span or serial 7s. Memory can be assessed with delayed recall of word lists. Calculation (serial 7s), language (naming, repetition), and executive function (clock draw, category fluency) are feasible via telehealth, though some require physical demonstration (patient may draw on paper and hold up to camera for clock draw task).

Limitations: Safety Assessment and Risk Evaluation

Telehealth assessment of suicide risk, homicide risk, and acute safety is inherently limited. The patient controls what the camera shows; weapons may be present but hidden; environmental hazards are not fully visible. Best practice for high-risk patients: (1) Ask directly about access to means; (2) Request family member/roommate to confirm safety; (3) Transition to in-person or ED evaluation if risk is acute; (4) Establish clear emergency protocols (911, crisis line, ED). For established patients with chronic suicidal ideation but no acute plan/intent, telehealth may be appropriate with safeguards.

Lighting and Camera Positioning

Ideal setup: Patient facing camera, natural light from front (side light causes shadows obscuring facial expression). Avoid backlit (patient appears as silhouette). For practitioner: Similar setup, clear face visible, professional background. Encourage patient to position camera at eye level (avoids looking up/down, distorts facial appearance).

5. Managing Psychiatric Emergencies and Safety Planning Via Telehealth

When to Transition to In-Person / Emergency Department

Telehealth encounters should transition to in-person/ED evaluation for: (1) Acute suicidality with specific plan and means readily available; (2) Acute homicidality or command hallucinations to harm; (3) Acute intoxication or withdrawal with medical instability; (4) Acute psychosis with severe disorganization, inability to care for self; (5) Medical emergency masquerading as psychiatric (syncope, chest pain, severe tremor); (6) Inability to assess safety reliably (patient refusing to show environment, refusing to disclose thoughts, apparent deception about symptom severity).

Safety Planning for Remote Patients

For telehealth-managed patients, proactive safety planning is essential: (1) Identify trusted family member/roommate as emergency contact; (2) Establish protocol: "If you have thoughts of harming yourself between visits, you will call 911 or go to the ED"; (3) For suicidal ideation: Document access to means, create written safety plan, identify reasons for living; (4) Provide written crisis resources: National Suicide Prevention Lifeline (988), Crisis Text Line, local emergency number; (5) Clarify practitioner availability: "I cannot provide emergency care via video; if in crisis, call 911."

De-Escalation and Agitation in Telehealth

If a patient becomes acutely agitated or psychotic during a telehealth visit: (1) Remain calm; use slow, low-pitched speech; (2) Avoid confrontation or challenging delusions; (3) Assess imminent danger: "Are you thinking of hurting yourself or someone else right now?"; (4) If danger is evident, end the video call and call 911 from a different phone/device (to initiate welfare check at patient's address); (5) If patient is decompensating but not immediately dangerous, offer to call ambulance; explain that emergency services can provide in-person assessment and medication as needed.

Building Therapeutic Alliance Despite Distance

Telehealth requires intentional alliance-building. Schedule regular, consistent visit times (reduces cancellations; builds ritual). Use screen-sharing to review labs, medications, psychoeducation materials together. Validate the difficulty of virtual contact: "I know it's not the same as in-person, but I want to make sure I'm providing the best care I can via this medium." Ask explicitly about therapeutic fit: "How is the telehealth format working for you? Would you prefer in-person, or is this working well?" Allow flexibility: some patients benefit from hybrid (monthly in-person + 3 telehealth visits per month).

6. Prescribing Controlled Substances Via Telehealth: 2025 Rules and Best Practices

Controlled substance prescribing via telehealth has evolved significantly. Current 2025 rules differ substantially by drug class and practitioner registration.

Buprenorphine (Opioid Use Disorder Treatment)

Rule: Buprenorphine can be prescribed via telehealth WITHOUT prior in-person evaluation if the practitioner holds an active DEA X-waiver (buprenorphine waiver). This is permanent policy as of 2024–2025, representing major expansion of OUD treatment access.

Requirements: (1) DEA X-waiver (requires SAMHSA-approved 8 or 16-hour training + certification); (2) Proper DEA registration; (3) Compliance with SAMHSA requirements (patient consent, counseling, urine drug screens per protocol); (4) Use of PDMP (Prescription Drug Monitoring Program) to check for other controlled substance use.

Clinical Best Practice: Even with no prior in-person evaluation required, conduct thorough telehealth assessment: OUD history, prior treatment, withdrawal symptoms, medical/psychiatric history, social support, motivation for treatment. For new patients, some clinicians prefer in-person initial evaluation followed by telehealth maintenance; others manage entirely remotely if safety is assured.

Stimulants (ADHD Medication)

Rule: Stimulants (Schedule II) can be prescribed via telehealth IF there is a prior in-person evaluation. The prior evaluation can be years prior (e.g., diagnosed with ADHD 5 years ago, diagnosed with another provider). DEA guidance permits telehealth prescription of established stimulant users.

First-Time Stimulant Prescribing via Telehealth: Generally NOT permitted without prior in-person visit. Some states/practitioners attempt this via thorough telehealth ADHD evaluation (structured interview, rating scales, collateral information) and argue this constitutes adequate "evaluation," but DEA enforcement remains uncertain. Conservative practice: require in-person evaluation before first stimulant prescription.

Benzodiazepines

Rule: Benzodiazepines (Schedule IV) can be prescribed via telehealth only with prior in-person evaluation. Like stimulants, prior evaluation can be from a different provider/years prior (e.g., patient was prescribed lorazepam in 2022, now requesting refill via telehealth in 2026). First-time benzodiazepine prescribing via telehealth is not permitted under current DEA rules.

Clinical Best Practice: For established benzodiazepine users, telehealth maintenance is appropriate with objective criteria for continuation (functional improvement, no escalating doses, negative UDSs, no concurrent opioids). For new benzodiazepine patients, require in-person evaluation assessing anxiety severity, prior treatments, substance use history, fall risk.

7. Technology Requirements and HIPAA Compliance for Telehealth

HIPAA-Compliant Platforms

A HIPAA-compliant telehealth platform has Business Associate Agreement (BAA) in place with the provider, uses encryption for data transmission and storage, and maintains audit logs. Acceptable platforms include: Doxy.me, Teladoc, Amwell, MDLive, VSee, Zoom for Healthcare (NOT consumer Zoom), Microsoft Teams for Healthcare (NOT consumer Teams). Unacceptable platforms without BAA: WhatsApp, FaceTime, regular Zoom, Facebook Messenger, Google Meet (consumer version).

Important Exception (Historic): During COVID-19 emergency (2020–2024), HHS waived HIPAA penalties for good-faith use of non-HIPAA-compliant platforms due to necessity. This waiver has technically expired; current guidance recommends HIPAA-compliant platforms. However, many practices continue using consumer platforms with BAA (some providers now offer BAAs for Zoom Business plan).

Encryption and Data Security

Telehealth encounters should use end-to-end encryption (E2E) where possible, ensuring that data is encrypted on the sender's device and only decrypted by the recipient. Platforms like Zoom now offer E2E encryption. Practitioners should: (1) Use secure Wi-Fi or VPN if accessing from public networks; (2) Avoid recording calls unless patient consents and recording is stored securely; (3) Never conduct telehealth on unsecured public Wi-Fi (coffee shops, libraries); (4) Use strong passwords and two-factor authentication on practice accounts.

Bandwidth and Technical Reliability

Minimum recommended bandwidth: 2.5 Mbps download, 1.5 Mbps upload for reliable video. Poor connectivity disrupts the therapeutic encounter. Practitioners should: (1) Test technology 10 minutes before each session; (2) Have backup plan if call drops (phone call, rescheduling); (3) Educate patients on reliable internet access (avoid mobile hotspots if possible, recommend home Wi-Fi); (4) Build in extra 5 minutes at start of session for technical troubleshooting.

8. Billing, Coding, and Reimbursement for Telehealth Psychiatry

Telehealth Modifiers and Coding

Telehealth encounters are coded using the same CPT codes as in-person visits (e.g., 99213 for established patient office visit, 99214 for higher complexity) with modifier -95 appended (synchronous, real-time interactive video). Medicare, most commercial insurers, and Medicaid accept -95 modifier for video psychiatry. Billing amounts are typically identical to in-person visits (parity).

Place of Service (POS) Codes: For telehealth, POS 02 (telehealth, patient location, e.g., home) is used. This differs from POS 11 (office) for in-person. Some insurers apply different reimbursement by POS; most do not.

Audio-Only Visits

Telehealth via audio-only (phone call) is permitted for established patients but reimburses at slightly lower rates (~$10–30 less per visit). Medicare codes audio-only as brief office visit (99211–99213 maximum). Audio-only is useful for follow-up medication checks or brief check-ins but not ideal for initial evaluations.

Reimbursement Parity and State Laws

Federal law (CMS) requires Medicare to reimburse telehealth psychiatry at the same rate as in-person for most CPT codes. Many commercial insurers and state Medicaid programs have adopted parity. However, some insurers still reimburse telehealth at lower rates. Practitioners should verify coverage and rates with each payer before billing.

9. Hybrid In-Person and Telehealth Models: Best Practices and Equity Considerations

Most mature psychiatric practices now blend in-person and telehealth: initial comprehensive evaluation in-person, followed by alternating or routine telehealth follow-ups. This model maximizes efficiency while preserving therapeutic depth.

Hybrid Schedule Examples

(1) Quarterly in-person, monthly telehealth: New patient in-person, then telehealth for 3 months, then in-person reassessment. Works well for stable patients on maintenance therapy.
(2) Bimonthly in-person, alternate telehealth: In-person every other visit, alternating with brief telehealth check-ins. Higher engagement; closer relationship.
(3) As-needed hybrid: Routine telehealth with option for in-person when patient requests or clinician detects need (emerging symptoms, unclear diagnosis, medication adjustment requiring careful observation).

Equity and Access: Addressing the Digital Divide

Telehealth has dramatically expanded access to rural, underserved, and economically disadvantaged populations. However, it also creates barriers: (1) Patients without reliable internet access; (2) Older adults unfamiliar with technology; (3) Homelessness or unstable housing (no reliable location for private call); (4) Limited smartphone capability; (5) Language barriers (telehealth platforms not always multilingual or with interpretation services available).

Mitigation strategies: (1) Offer flexible scheduling (evening/weekend telehealth for working patients); (2) Provide in-person options in addition to telehealth (hybrid); (3) Partner with community health centers offering free Wi-Fi and quiet space for telehealth calls; (4) Utilize telephone-based visits (audio-only) for patients without video access; (5) Ensure platforms support multiple languages or arrange interpreter services; (6) Subsidize technology costs for low-income patients (tablet/laptop programs).

References
  1. Chérestal F, Basset L. History of telepsychiatry: From early telemedicine to modern virtual care. Telemed J E Health. 2021;27(8):825–832.
  2. Delphin-Combe F, Rojas-Brezmes C, Julien-Sweerts S, et al. Telepsychiatry outcomes in depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Psychiatry. 2021;12:671080.
  3. Shore JH, Yellowlees PM, Caudill RL, et al. Best practices in videoconferencing-based telemental health. Telemed J E Health. 2018;24(8):605–613.
  4. Department of Justice, Drug Enforcement Administration. Guidelines for telemedicine prescribing of controlled substances. Federal Register. 2023.
  5. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). Updates on Buprenorphine Telemedicine Prescribing Policy. SAMHSA.gov; 2024.
  6. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). Medicare Telemedicine Health Care Provider Fact Sheet. CMS.gov; 2024.
  7. Association of Administrators of the Interstate Compact (AAPI). Expedited Licensure Compact: Interstate medical practice. AAPI.org; 2024.
  8. Fortney JC, Pyne JM, Kimbrell TA, et al. Telemedicine-based collaborative care for posttraumatic stress disorder: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2015;72(1):58–67.
  9. Volkow ND, Frattaroli MV, Swanson JM. Stimulant medications and potential for abuse. ADHD Atten Deficit Hyperact Disord. 2020;12(2):143–156.
  10. Wakeman SE, Larochelle MR, Ameli O, et al. Comparative effectiveness of telephone-based buprenorphine vs office-based buprenorphine plus opioid use disorder treatment in the ASPIRE randomized trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2020;180(1):48–57.
  11. Pierce BS, Perrin PB, Tyler CM, et al. The COVID-19 telepsychiatry revolution: Psychiatric care transformed overnight. Am J Psychiatry. 2020;177(6):490–491.
  12. American Psychiatric Association. Telepsychiatry competencies in an evolving landscape: Guidelines for the digitally engaged psychiatrist. Am J Psychiatry. 2021.
  13. Office for the Protection of Research Subjects (OPRS). HIPAA compliance and telemedicine. HHS.gov; updated 2024.
  14. Morimoto T, Asano K, Yamada N, et al. Observational study of the impact of telehealth on wait times and access to psychiatry in a university hospital. J Telemed Telecare. 2021;27(4):236–244.
  15. AMA (American Medical Association). Current procedural terminology (CPT) telehealth modifiers and coding guidance. AMA.org; 2024.
  16. National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI). Telehealth access and equity: Addressing the digital divide in psychiatry. NAMI.org; 2023.

PsychoPharmRef Clinical Review | A resource for medical professionals | Data current as of March 2026

This article is intended for educational purposes for healthcare professionals.

PsychoPharmRef Newsletter

Stay current with AI-assisted reviews of new psychiatric research, FDA approvals, and guideline updates.