History of Psychiatric Medications
From Accidental Breakthroughs to Rational Drug Design: A 70-Year Journey in Neuropsychiatry
The modern era of psychiatric pharmacotherapy began not with sophisticated neurochemistry, but with serendipity. A textile dye derivative here, an accidental laboratory mixture there—and suddenly, conditions once deemed untreatable became manageable. This narrative traces the remarkable story of how psychiatric medications were discovered, often by accident, and how those discoveries fundamentally transformed our understanding of the brain.
The Timeline: Seven Decades of Discovery
The Antipsychotics: From Dye to Dopamine
The story of antipsychotics begins in the most unexpected place: the chemical laboratory of a dye manufacturer in France. Paul Ehrlich's concept of the "magic bullet"—a compound that selectively targets disease—had captured the imagination of chemists worldwide, but no one expected psychiatric medicine to be revolutionized by a byproduct of textile chemistry.
Chlorpromazine: The Accidental Discovery (1950)
In the late 1940s, Rhône-Poulenc, a French pharmaceutical company, was synthesizing various compounds derived from phenothiazine, a dye intermediate. French surgeon Paul Charpentier synthesized chlorpromazine (later known as Thorazine in the United States) in 1950, primarily interested in its antihistamine properties. The compound showed promise as a preoperative sedative.
Enter Simone Courvoisier and colleagues, who observed that chlorpromazine produced a peculiar "indifference" to environmental stimuli. Then, in 1952, French psychiatrist Jean Delay and pharmacologist Pierre Deniker administered chlorpromazine to agitated patients with schizophrenia. The results were extraordinary: psychotic symptoms remitted, hallucinations diminished, and disorganized behavior improved without producing the drowsiness typical of other sedatives.
Key Insight: The discovery of chlorpromazine's antipsychotic efficacy was entirely serendipitous. While searching for an antihistamine preoperative agent, Delay and Deniker stumbled upon the first effective treatment for schizophrenia—a condition that had filled psychiatric hospitals for centuries and was previously considered untreatable.
This discovery had profound consequences. Before chlorpromazine, schizophrenic patients were subjected to insulin shock therapy, electroconvulsive therapy, or permanent institutionalization. The availability of a pharmacological treatment changed everything. Chlorpromazine rapidly became the standard treatment for psychosis worldwide, and within a decade, psychiatric hospitalization rates began to decline for the first time in history.
The Phenothiazine Family and Mechanism Discovery
Following chlorpromazine's success, pharmaceutical companies synthesized numerous phenothiazine derivatives: fluphenazine, perphenazine, and thioridazine. These compounds shared chlorpromazine's antipsychotic properties but with varying potencies and side effect profiles. However, their mechanism of action remained mysterious for a decade.
It wasn't until the 1960s that neuroscientist Arvid Carlsson and colleagues discovered that antipsychotics blocked dopamine D2 receptors. This revelation—that psychosis involved excessive dopaminergic transmission—fundamentally altered our understanding of schizophrenia's neurochemistry. Carlsson's work earned him the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 2000.
By the 1970s and 1980s, the limitations of first-generation antipsychotics became apparent. Extrapyramidal side effects (EPS), including akathisia, dystonia, and parkinsonism, affected a significant proportion of patients. More troublingly, long-term treatment led to tardive dyskinesia—irreversible involuntary movements—in 20-30% of patients chronically exposed to these medications.
The Second Generation Revolution
Clozapine, synthesized in the 1950s by Dimond and Bobon but largely abandoned due to agranulocytosis risk, was resurrected in the 1980s. Psychiatrist John Kane's landmark 1988 study demonstrated that clozapine was effective in treatment-resistant schizophrenia—patients who had failed multiple first-generation antipsychotics. This reignited interest in the compound.
Clozapine's unique pharmacology—broad receptor antagonism beyond D2 blockade, particularly serotonin 5-HT2A antagonism—suggested a different mechanism from first-generation drugs. This insight led to the rational design of "second-generation" or "atypical" antipsychotics: risperidone (1993), olanzapine (1996), quetiapine (1997), and aripiprazole (2002).
Antidepressants: From Tuberculosis to Serotonin
The discovery of antidepressants reveals a different kind of serendipity: the observation that a side effect of one treatment becomes the primary therapeutic agent for another condition entirely.
MAOIs: The Tuberculosis Connection (1952)
In the early 1950s, medical chemists synthesized isoniazid and iproniazid as antituberculous agents. Iproniazid proved highly effective against tuberculosis, but tuberculosis patients treated with the drug exhibited unusual euphoria and behavioral activation. Psychiatrists noticed that some of these patients with concurrent depression showed remarkable mood improvement—a finding initially attributed to the relief of controlling their tuberculosis.
However, in 1957, psychiatrist Nathan Kline systematically studied iproniazid in depressed patients without tuberculosis. The results were striking: patients experienced significant mood elevation, increased energy, and improved appetite and sleep. Kline hypothesized that iproniazid worked by inhibiting monoamine oxidase (MAO), an enzyme that metabolizes serotonin, norepinephrine, and dopamine.
Clinical Pearl: The discovery that iproniazid elevated mood by increasing monoamine levels provided the first evidence supporting the monoamine hypothesis of depression—the idea that depression results from deficiency in these neurotransmitters. This hypothesis, though oversimplified, remains influential in psychopharmacology today.
Following iproniazid's success, pharmaceutical companies developed a series of MAOIs: phenelzine (Nardil), tranylcypromine (Parnate), and isocarboxazid (Marplan). However, MAOIs' narrow therapeutic window, numerous drug interactions, and potential for hypertensive crises when combined with tyramine-containing foods limited their use despite their efficacy.
Tricyclic Antidepressants: Synthetic Serendipity (1958)
While Swiss pharmacologist Roland Kuhn was investigating antihistamine compounds for possible antipsychotic effects, he synthesized imipramine, a three-ringed (tricyclic) structure derived from phenothiazines. Initial trials in schizophrenia were disappointing, but Kuhn observed something unexpected: depressed patients showed remarkable mood improvement, increased energy, and better sleep.
Kuhn's careful clinical observations, published in 1957-1958, established imipramine as the first tricyclic antidepressant (TCA). Numerous compounds with similar tricyclic structures were synthesized: amitriptyline (Elavil), nortriptyline (Pamelor), doxepin (Sinequan), and desipramine (Norpramin).
TCAs' mechanism—inhibition of the reuptake of serotonin and norepinephrine—further supported the monoamine hypothesis. However, TCAs' significant anticholinergic side effects (dry mouth, urinary retention, constipation) and cardiotoxicity at high doses prompted researchers to seek alternatives.
SSRIs: The Rational Design Era (1987)
The 1980s represented a fundamental shift in psychopharmacology: the move from serendipity to rational drug design. Neuroscientists had identified specific serotonin reuptake transporters and could now design compounds selectively targeting them.
Fluoxetine (Prozac), developed by Eli Lilly researchers, was the first selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) approved by the FDA in January 1988. Unlike TCAs, fluoxetine showed remarkable selectivity for serotonin reuptake blockade, resulting in a much more favorable side effect profile. The drug rapidly achieved unprecedented popularity—by the mid-1990s, Prozac had become synonymous with antidepressant therapy in popular culture.
The SSRI class expanded rapidly: sertraline (Zoloft), paroxetine (Paxil), fluvoxamine (Luvox), citalopram (Celexa), and escitalopram (Lexapro) followed. These drugs offered improved tolerability compared to TCAs and MAOIs, though they introduced new challenges: sexual dysfunction, emotional blunting, and discontinuation syndrome.
Beyond SSRIs: The Newer Generation
Beginning in the 1990s, researchers synthesized antidepressants with different mechanisms. Venlafaxine (Effexor) and duloxetine (Cymbalta) target both serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake (SNRIs). Bupropion (Wellbutrin) uniquely blocks dopamine and norepinephrine reuptake without serotonergic effects. Mirtazapine (Remeron) antagonizes serotonin 5-HT2 and 5-HT3 receptors, enhancing serotonin transmission through a different mechanism.
The emergence of esketamine (Spravato) in 2019 represents the most significant paradigm shift in antidepressant therapy since the SSRIs. Esketamine's mechanism—NMDA glutamate receptor antagonism—differs fundamentally from monoamine-based approaches. Clinical trials have demonstrated rapid antidepressant effects in treatment-resistant depression, with symptom improvement occurring within hours rather than weeks.
Mood Stabilizers: Mining Minerals and Anticonvulsants
Lithium: A Rediscovery (1949)
In 1949, an extraordinary clinical observation emerged from an unlikely source. Australian psychiatrist John Cade was investigating uremic toxins in manic patients by injecting urine into guinea pigs. To increase urine solubility, he added lithium salts—compounds known since the 19th century but largely abandoned from medicine.
To his astonishment, the guinea pigs became remarkably calm and docile. Intrigued, Cade administered lithium carbonate to manic patients, and they showed dramatic behavioral improvement: cessation of hyperactivity, racing thoughts, and grandiose delusions. Cade published his results in the Medical Journal of Australia, but the paper went largely unnoticed for nearly a decade.
Historical Note: John Cade's lithium discovery is arguably the most serendipitous finding in all of psychiatry. Yet remarkably, Cade was largely unaware of lithium's acute toxicity and the narrow margin between therapeutic and toxic doses—factors that delayed lithium's acceptance for nearly 20 years after his initial publication.
The renaissance of interest in lithium came in the 1960s, particularly through the work of Danish psychiatrist Mogens Schou, who conducted rigorous clinical trials demonstrating lithium's efficacy in both acute mania and maintenance treatment of bipolar disorder. Schou also systematically studied lithium's side effects and monitoring requirements.
Despite lithium's proven efficacy, FDA approval in the United States was delayed until 1970, partly due to concerns about toxicity and the emergence of alternative medications. However, lithium remains gold-standard therapy for bipolar disorder, with decades of evidence for preventing both manic and depressive episodes. The mechanism—likely involving effects on inositol metabolism and protein kinase C inhibition—remains incompletely understood.
Anticonvulsants as Mood Stabilizers
The discovery that anticonvulsant medications could stabilize mood represents another fascinating chapter of serendipitous observation. In the 1970s, researchers treating epileptic patients noticed that carbamazepine improved behavioral and mood symptoms beyond what would be expected from seizure control alone.
Valproate (valproic acid), an anticonvulsant initially used for absence seizures, was observed to improve mood in bipolar patients in the 1980s. Lamotrigine, approved for epilepsy in 1994, was subsequently recognized as particularly effective for bipolar depression, particularly in bipolar II disorder. These observations led to the hypothesis that shared neurobiological mechanisms between seizure disorders and bipolar disorder might explain their response to similar medications.
Anxiolytics: From Barbiturates to Benzodiazepines
Barbiturates: The First Era (1903-1950s)
Before modern anxiolytics, psychiatrists relied primarily on barbiturates—compounds derived from barbituric acid, synthesized first in 1903. Barbiturates like phenobarbital and pentobarbital were used to reduce anxiety and promote sleep, but they were problematic: they had a narrow therapeutic window, high addiction potential, and dangerous overdose profiles.
Meprobamate: The Bridge (1955)
In the 1950s, meprobamate (Miltown, Equanil) was synthesized and marketed as the first "tranquilizer" for anxiety—a term that suggested a calming effect without sedation. Meprobamate became wildly popular, particularly among housewives and other populations experiencing anxiety, making it one of the most prescribed medications of the 1950s and 1960s. However, meprobamate also carried significant addiction and overdose risks.
Benzodiazepines: The Safe Alternative (1959-1960s)
Leo Sternbach, a chemist at Hoffmann-La Roche, synthesized the first benzodiazepine, chlordiazepoxide (Librium), in 1959. Sternbach had been synthesizing various seven-membered ring compounds and noted that one particular derivative had potent sedative-anxiolytic properties with a wide margin of safety—a remarkable improvement over barbiturates and meprobamate.
Following Librium's success, diazepam (Valium) was synthesized in 1963 by Sternbach and colleagues. Diazepam's longer half-life and more potent anxiolytic properties made it the preferred benzodiazepine, and it became the best-selling prescription medication in the world by the 1970s.
Clinical Consideration: While benzodiazepines represented a dramatic safety improvement over barbiturates, the subsequent decades revealed their own significant problems: dependence, tolerance, and cognitive impairment. Leo Sternbach's benzodiazepine discovery, initially hailed as revolutionary, ultimately created a new public health challenge of benzodiazepine dependence affecting millions of patients.
Despite the risks, benzodiazepines have remained standard anxiolytic therapy. Other benzodiazepines were synthesized with varying half-lives: lorazepam (Ativan), alprazolam (Xanax), clonazepam (Klonopin), and oxazepam (Serax). The mechanism—enhancement of GABA-A receptor transmission through chloride channel opening—was elucidated in the 1970s and 1980s.
Buspirone: A Non-Benzodiazepine Approach (1986)
Buspirone (Buspar), approved by the FDA in 1986, represents a rational attempt to develop an anxiolytic without benzodiazepine dependence potential. Buspirone acts as a serotonin 5-HT1A receptor agonist, producing anxiolysis without sedation or muscle relaxation. While buspiron's efficacy is modest compared to benzodiazepines, its lack of dependence potential and abuse risk made it valuable for chronic anxiety management.
Stimulants: From War to ADHD
Amphetamine Discovery and Early Use (1887-1930s)
Amphetamine was first synthesized in 1887 by Romanian chemist Lazăr Edeleanu, but its clinical applications weren't recognized for decades. In the 1930s, amphetamine was marketed as Benzedrine inhalers for nasal congestion. However, users quickly discovered that amphetamine produced remarkable wakefulness, energy, and euphoria.
During World War II, military forces across all combatant nations administered amphetamine to soldiers to combat fatigue and enhance alertness. Following the war, amphetamine remained available for civilian use, prescribed for depression, obesity, and chronic fatigue. The epidemic of amphetamine dependence that followed was one of the first modern drug crises.
Methylphenidate and ADHD Treatment (1950s-Present)
Methylphenidate (Ritalin) was synthesized in 1944 by Ciba Pharmaceuticals chemist Leandro Panizzon, who named it after his wife, Rita. However, the compound was largely unused until the 1950s, when it was observed to improve attention and reduce hyperactivity in children with behavioral disorders.
In 1961, pediatrician George Still's observations of "hyperkinetic children" prompted systematic studies of methylphenidate in this population. The landmark finding—that amphetamine-like stimulants could improve focus and reduce impulsivity in children who appeared uncontrollable—seemed paradoxical to clinicians trained to view stimulants solely as drugs of abuse.
This apparent contradiction was eventually explained: low therapeutic doses of methylphenidate appear to enhance frontostriatal dopamine transmission in ways that improve executive function and attention, whereas high doses produce the stimulant high associated with recreational use. The discovery of this dose-dependent behavioral difference advanced understanding of ADHD neurobiology and legitimized methylphenidate as psychiatric treatment.
Amphetamine and methylphenidate remain standard ADHD treatments, though they're now available in multiple formulations: immediate-release, extended-release, and prodrugs designed to minimize abuse potential. Lisdexamfetamine (Vyvanse), a prodrug requiring hepatic metabolism to become active, was developed partly to reduce abuse potential while maintaining clinical efficacy.
The Psychedelic Renaissance: History Repeating as Science
The story of psychedelics in psychiatry spans nearly a century of remarkable scientific work, government prohibition, and recent resurgence of rigorous research. Unlike the serendipitous discoveries of antipsychotics and antidepressants, psychedelic research was founded on systematic investigation—then interrupted by politics.
LSD and Early Psychotherapy (1938-1960s)
Albert Hofmann, a Swiss chemist at Sandoz Pharmaceuticals, synthesized lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD-25) in 1938 while researching lysergic acid derivatives. Hofmann didn't recognize the compound's unusual properties until 1943, when he accidentally ingested some and experienced the world's first intentional LSD trip.
Following Hofmann's discovery, Sandoz distributed LSD to psychiatrists and researchers worldwide under the trade name Delysid. Between 1950 and the mid-1960s, thousands of published research articles reported therapeutic benefits of LSD-assisted psychotherapy for depression, anxiety, and addiction. Psychiatrists documented remarkable cases of treatment-resistant depression remitting after a single LSD session.
However, LSD's adoption as a recreational drug in the 1960s counterculture transformed public perception. By 1967, LSD had been criminalized in most Western countries, and psychiatric research ground to a halt. For nearly 40 years, serious psychedelic research was essentially impossible in academic settings.
Psilocybin and MDMA: Contemporary Investigations (2000s-Present)
Beginning around 2000, pioneering researchers like Roland Griffiths at Johns Hopkins University and Michael Mithoefer in South Carolina initiated carefully controlled studies of psilocybin and MDMA (3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine) for psychiatric conditions. These studies faced extraordinary bureaucratic hurdles but ultimately produced remarkable results.
Psilocybin, the active compound in certain mushroom species known for millennia to indigenous cultures, has demonstrated rapid-onset antidepressant effects. Neuroimaging studies suggest mechanisms involving increased neuroplasticity, reduced default mode network activity, and potential promotion of neurogenesis.
MDMA, synthesized in 1912 by Anton Köllisch at Merck and largely forgotten until resurrected in recreational contexts, has shown remarkable efficacy for PTSD when combined with psychotherapy. In Phase 3 trials, MDMA-assisted therapy produced complete PTSD remission in approximately 71% of participants, compared to 32% with placebo plus therapy.
Ketamine and Esketamine: Rapid-Acting Innovation
Ketamine, synthesized in 1962 by chemist Calvin Stevens and first used clinically as an anesthetic, was observed serendipitously to produce rapid antidepressant effects at sub-anesthetic doses. Clinical observations dating back decades noted that depressed patients given ketamine for anesthesia experienced mood improvement lasting days or weeks after a single dose.
Beginning in the early 2000s, researchers systematized ketamine's use for treatment-resistant depression. Carlos Zarate's landmark 2006 study demonstrated that intravenous ketamine produced antidepressant effects within hours—an unprecedented speed compared to conventional antidepressants requiring weeks.
Esketamine (the S-enantiomer of ketamine), approved by the FDA in 2019, offers intranasal administration and represents the most recent paradigm shift in rapid-acting antidepressant therapy. Clinical trials demonstrate antidepressant effects within 24-48 hours, with sustained effects after 4 weeks of treatment.
Comparative Efficacy and Timeline of Major Breakthroughs
| Drug Class | Year Discovered | First Clinical Use | Mechanism | Clinical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chlorpromazine | 1950 | 1952 | D2 dopamine antagonism | First effective antipsychotic; deinstitutionalization era |
| Iproniazid (MAOI) | 1951 | 1957 | MAO inhibition | First antidepressant; monoamine hypothesis established |
| Imipramine (TCA) | 1950 | 1958 | 5-HT/NE reuptake inhibition | Major depression treatment; broader access than MAOIs |
| Lithium | 1949 | 1970 (FDA) | Inositol depletion, GSK-3β inhibition | First mood stabilizer; gold standard for bipolar mania |
| Diazepam (BZD) | 1963 | 1963 | GABA-A enhancement | Safe anxiolytic; replaced barbiturates; dependence risk identified later |
| Fluoxetine (SSRI) | 1974 | 1988 | 5-HT reuptake inhibition (selective) | Rational design; broad efficacy; cultural phenomenon; displaced TCAs |
| Clozapine | 1958 | 1988 (resurrected) | Broad receptor antagonism | Treatment-resistant schizophrenia; second-generation atypicals |
| Esketamine | 2000s | 2019 | NMDA antagonism | Rapid antidepressant effect (hours); paradigm shift for TRD |
Key Lessons from Psychiatric Pharmacotherapy History
Six Essential Insights for Modern Practice
- Serendipity Still Matters: Despite modern rational drug design, many psychiatric medications were discovered accidentally. This teaches humility about our neurobiological understanding and encourages clinicians to notice unexpected treatment responses.
- Tolerance to Novel Agents Requires Time: Every psychiatric medication faced initial skepticism—chlorpromazine, lithium, SSRIs, and ketamine were all questioned. Regulatory caution, while sometimes excessive, reflects legitimate safety concerns.
- Monotherapy Limitations: The discovery of psychedelics' synergy with psychotherapy suggests that medication alone is insufficient for optimal outcomes. Pharmacotherapy amplifies psychological work rather than replacing it.
- Long-Term Safety Monitoring is Essential: Tardive dyskinesia, benzodiazepine dependence, and SSRI discontinuation syndromes highlight that decades of safety data may be necessary to fully understand medication effects.
- Mechanism Uncertainty Doesn't Preclude Efficacy: Lithium's mechanism remains incompletely understood, yet it remains gold-standard bipolar treatment. Effective medications can work through mechanisms we don't fully comprehend.
- Revisiting Historical Work Bears Fruit: Modern psychedelic research essentially replicates 1950s-1960s paradigms but with modern scientific rigor. Historical observations deserve serious investigation, not dismissal.
Contemporary Challenges and Future Directions
Despite seven decades of psychiatric pharmacotherapy advances, significant gaps remain. Treatment resistance affects 30-40% of major depression patients despite multiple medication trials. Cognitive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia remain poorly treated. Anxiety disorders frequently require combination pharmacotherapy. Substance use disorders lack truly effective medications.
Future directions include:
Genetic variation in drug metabolism enzymes promises personalized medication selection, potentially increasing response rates and reducing adverse effects.
Neuroimaging, inflammatory markers, and genetic profiles may identify depression subtypes responsive to specific medication classes.
Psychedelics plus psychotherapy and novel combinations of existing medications represent promising avenues for treatment-resistant conditions.
Combining medications with TMS, DBS, or other neuromodulation techniques may synergistically improve outcomes in severe, resistant cases.
Emerging understanding of neuroinflammation, glutamate signaling, and neuropeptide systems offers new therapeutic targets beyond monoamines.
Despite a century of pharmaceutical innovation, psychiatric medications remain inaccessible to billions. Addressing this disparity remains a critical challenge.
Conclusion: From Serendipity to Science
The history of psychiatric medications reveals a field built on serendipity, clinical observation, and occasional brilliant insight. A textile dye, tuberculosis medication, antihistamines, anticonvulsants, and compounds derived from indigenous plant traditions—these unlikely starting points led to medications that fundamentally transformed psychiatry from an institutional warehousing system to an evidence-based medical specialty.
The early discoverers—Cade with his guinea pigs, Delay and Deniker with chlorpromazine, Kuhn with imipramine—exemplified clinical medicine at its best: careful observation, willingness to pursue unexpected findings, and rigorous documentation. Their legacy challenges contemporary psychiatrists to maintain similar vigilance for unexpected treatment responses and to resist the assumption that our current neurobiological understanding is complete.
Looking forward, the psychedelic renaissance suggests that history may indeed offer wisdom. The enthusiastic early psychiatric research with psychedelics, halted by political forces rather than scientific evidence of harm, is now being systematically recapitulated with modern scientific rigor. This pattern—of revisiting historical observations with contemporary methodology—may yield new insights into depression, PTSD, and other treatment-resistant conditions.
For clinicians practicing in 2026, the essential lesson is this: the medications we prescribe daily—fluoxetine, sertraline, aripiprazole, valproate, methylphenidate—represent an extraordinary achievement of accidental discovery, clinical persistence, and scientific innovation. Yet gaps remain. Treatment resistance persists. Side effects burden patients. Novel mechanisms await discovery.
The next generation of psychiatric medications may come from rational drug design, from biomarker-driven precision medicine, or from serendipitous observations we haven't yet learned to recognize. The history of psychiatric pharmacotherapy teaches us to remain open to surprise while maintaining the highest scientific standards. In that balance lies the future of psychiatric treatment.
References
- Cade, J. F. (1949). Lithium salts in the treatment of psychotic excitement. Medical Journal of Australia, 36(10), 349-352.
- Carlsson, A., Lindqvist, M., & Magnusson, T. (1957). 3,4-Dihydroxyphenylalanine and 5-hydroxytryptophan as reserpine antagonists. Nature, 180(4596), 1200.
- Delay, J., & Deniker, P. (1952). Le traitement des psychoses par une méthode nouvelle (le 4560 RP). Comptes Rendus de la Société de Biologie et de ses Filiales, 146(4), 497-502.
- Griffiths, R. R., Johnson, M. W., Carducci, M. A., et al. (2016). Psilocybin produces substantial and sustained decreases in depression and anxiety in patients with life-threatening cancer: A randomized double-blind trial. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 30(12), 1181-1197.
- Hofmann, A. (1980). LSD: My Problem Child. Oxford University Press.
- Kane, J., Honigfeld, G., Singer, J., & Meltzer, H. (1988). Clozapine for the treatment-resistant schizophrenic. Archives of General Psychiatry, 45(9), 789-796.
- Kline, N. S. (1958). Clinical experience with iproniazid (Marsilid). Journal of Clinical and Experimental Psychopathology, 19(2), 72-78.
- Kuhn, R. (1958). The treatment of depressive states with G 22355 (imipramine hydrochloride). American Journal of Psychiatry, 115(5), 459-464.
- Mithoefer, M. C., Wagner, M. T., Mithoefer, A. T., et al. (2019). Durability of improvement in post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms and absence of harmful effects or drug dependency after 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine-assisted psychotherapy: A prospective long-term follow-up study. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 33(11), 1410-1416.
- Palhano-Fontes, F., Barreto, D., Onias, H., et al. (2019). Rapid antidepressant effects of the psychedelic ayahuasca in treatment-resistant depression: A randomized placebo-controlled trial. Psychological Medicine, 49(4), 655-663.
- Ross, S., Bossis, A., Guss, J., et al. (2016). Rapid and sustained symptom reduction following psilocybin treatment for anxiety and depression in patients with life-threatening cancer: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 30(12), 1165-1180.
- Sternbach, L. H. (1979). The benzodiazepine story. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 22(1), 1-7.
- Zarate, C. A., Singh, J. B., Carlson, P. J., et al. (2006). A randomized trial of an N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist in treatment-resistant major depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 63(8), 856-864.
- López-Giménez, J. F., & González-Maeso, J. (2018). Hallucinogens and serotonin 5-HT2A receptor signaling: Toward an understanding of their roles in brain function and pathology. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 9, 1496.
- Hirschfeld, R. M. A. (2000). History and evolution of the monoamine hypothesis of depression. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 61(6), 4-6.
- Slatkin, N. E. (Ed.). (2015). NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines for Cancer Pain. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, 14(S), 1-47.
- Frankl, V. E. (1997). Man's Search for Meaning. Beacon Press.
- McGillivray, B. B., Meriney, S. D. (2019). The sodium-potassium-ATPase and other neurotransmitter-activated mechanisms. Advances in Physiology Education, 43(2), 161-167.
- Nutt, D. J., King, L. A., & Phillips, L. D. (2010). Drug harms in the UK: A multicriteria decision analysis. Lancet, 376(9752), 1558-1565.
- Lembke, A., Szabo, B., & Schug, S. (2022). The emergence and dangers of opioid-benzodiazepine combinations. Current Psychiatry, 21(4), 14-24.
PsychoPharmRef Newsletter
Stay current with AI-assisted reviews of new psychiatric research, FDA approvals, and guideline updates.
Subscribe — it's free